The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar on Wednesday, July 10 continued their defence of the petition against President Muhammadu Buhari’s re-election with sets of witnesses singing discordant tunes.
Counsel for the petitioners, Dr Livy Uzoukwu commenced the activity of the day with the presentation of Alhaji Tanko Bichi; a local government collation agent for PDP in Katsina State for his testimonies.
Bichi, in his evidence in chief, reported the election in his area was marred by widespread malpractices; but he could not substantiate the claim when he was crossed-examined.
On his part, Alhaji Salisu Majigiri; Katsina State chairman of the PDP said the result declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the state was different from figures collated from the various polling units and wards.
Majigiri, who was also the State Collation Agent for the PDP claimed that the result sheets containing the outcome of the election in the state.
This was signed by various party agents which showed that Atiku won in Katsina State.
He alleged that second petitioner (Atiku) scored a total of 905,000 votes; Buhari scored 872,000 votes as against the 160,203 votes and 1,555,633 votes recorded for the contestants respectively by INEC.
Majigiri also explained that the 34 ad-hoc staff engaged by the electoral commission were substituted with the second respondent’s agents to perfect the rigging.
When crossed examined, however; Majigiri was unable to provide cogent insights on how Atiku was rigged out of the election in the state.
Majigiri also failed to present either an original or duplicate copies of the acclaimed signed election result sheets that reflected Atiku’s victory in the state.
The state chairman of the PDP could not also advance reasons why those materials were not brought before the tribunal.